filed under Parenting
Quantity Leads to Quality
comment 11 Written by Keith on November 26, 2009 – 12:42 pm

CarnegieHallPosters65 

When it comes to teaching my boys how to do something or them teaching themselves, I have always directed them to slow down, take their time and think everything out before doing anything.  That seems like a pretty reasonable course of action.  It’s what I was taught, and I think most parents feel the same way, that success breeds success.  Of all my parenting techniques that work I am glad that I’ve recently discovered that the quality over quantity theory seems now to be wrong.  I got the following quote from the book Sketching User Experience by Bill Buxton.  His theory, not without research, is that the actual formula for success is nothing more than repetition, not great attention to detail.  This revelation is going to make my teaching with the boys much more pleasant as the short term goal is simple action rather than perfection. 

“A ceramics professor comes in on the first day of class and divides the students into two sections. He tells one half of the class that their final grade will be based exclusively on the volume of their production; the more they make, the better their grade. The professor tells the other half of the class that they will be graded more traditionally, based solely on the quality of their best piece.

 

At the end of the semester, the professor discovered that the students who were focused on making as many pots as possible also ended up creating the best pots, much better than the pots made by the students who spent all semester trying to create that one perfect pot.”

 

 Yoda-CVDIt turns out that, while some people do have a natural inclination toward certain pursuits, the gap in expertise between them and the rest of us comes from their dedication much more than it does any natural ability.  For anybody who has read Malcolm Gladwell’s popular book Outliers: The Story of Success you will be familiar with the 10,000 hour rule.  Very simply it says this: You can be a master at any complex task as long as you spend 10,000 hours practicing it.  It applies to Music, Sports, Writing, Science or anything else you’d fancy learning.  The point is that the people who are masters are not necessarily gifted people.  They aren’t just born with massive talent, rather they achieve it through hard work.  Even people like Motzart, who we assume was simply a freak of nature, are trapped by the 10,000 hour rule.  They practice and therefore they are geniuses, not they are geniuses who happen to practice. 

“In study after study, of composers, basketball players, fiction writers, ice-skaters, concert pianists, chess players, master criminals… this number comes up again and again. Ten thousand hours is equivalent to roughly three hours a day, or twenty hours a week, of practice over ten years… No one has yet found a case in which true world-class expertise was accomplished in less time. It seems that it takes the brain this long to assimilate all that it needs to know to achieve true mastery.”

 

outliersDoes the 10,000 hour rule guarantee success?  No, it doesn’t, but not because mastery won’t be achieved.  There are plenty of factors that go into what we consider success.  It’s a little luck mixed with a bit of brains.  There are plenty of masters in the world who never reach the top of their field.  My martial arts master is a good example.  The man spent his whole life studying martial arts.  His precision was better than anybody I’ve ever seen.  I might go so far as to say that he had a Bruce Lee level of focus on martial arts. That being said though, he never found success.  He’s still running a cruddy little academy and making barely enough money to support his family.  Obviously success requires more than mastery.  Still, mastery is a prerequisite.

 

My boys probably don’t have extreme intelligence, but that doesn’t matter.  An interesting fact about intelligence is that it does not influence success as much as we think it does.  Simply above average smarts is all that’s needed for any level of success.  Geniuses are often handicapped by their inability to relate and, unless they find constructive outlets like astrophysics, are doomed to obscurity.  It’s somewhat comforting to know that success really is derived from hard work.  We all love Larry Bird because he seems a lot like us except much more talented.  Now we know why.  The guy just practiced like crazy.  10,000 hours of practice is equivalent to 20 hours a week for roughly 10 years.  I’m not even too old to start mastering something.  My kids truly can be anything they want to be.

 

3604021213_a1af39de85_o


If you enjoyed the article, why not subscribe?

11 Responses to “Quantity Leads to Quality”

  1. I really enjoyed that post Keith. I will remember this because I tend to demand a lot of quality from the get-go and I can see how consistency and quantity can pay off toward quality in the end now. It makes me think about what Stephen Covey says in “7 Habits of Highly Effective People”: “Always begin with the end in mind.”
    Thanks again!
    Joan´s last blog ..But, I Can’t Afford to Homeschool My ComLuv Profile

  2. Nice post.

    By J. Cruikshank on November 26, 2009 | Reply
  3. Segovia started learning to play guitar at the age of 40. And 10,000 hours, assuming 40 hours a week is only 5 years. And for those who work 80 hours a week, that’s condensed down to 30 months.

    I don’t fully subscribe to the 10,000 rule in Outliers, because there is a self-selection bias. Kids who aren’t good at something aren’t likely to continue practicing– and those who excel will naturally do more. So the 10,000 hours, though correlated with master– is often the result, not the cause.

    Look at the hackers on the golf course who have been playing for years and still suck as bad as ever– in fact, reinforcing their bad habits into ever deeper grooves.

    That said, I think a positive attitude is the most important element– as losing enthusiasm is the cause of failure. Keith, I enjoyed your post about praising kids, in that there is no such thing as too much praise.
    Dennis Yu´s last blog ..Have You Seen Sitelinks in Google AdWords Premium Ad Positions? My ComLuv Profile

  4. Dennis, of course there is self selection when it comes to mastering skills. People won’t practice something they don’t enjoy. But that has nothing to do with the rule. part of the point is that people stop practicing at the point at which they become bored or the activity no longer interests them or they feel they’ve learned enough. People who do put in the 10,000 hours are those who not only have the aptitude but also the drive. Those who don’t have the aptitude or the drive will not, by self selection, reach that 10,000 hours. Your reasoning doesn’t prove you don’t subscribe to it, it simply explains the rule further. as for Golfers who are hacks. Are they really practicing or are they socializing and using golf as a filler? They aren’t really devoting themselves to it. Practice means doing something with the express intent of getting better at that activity. Golfers who truly practice do indeed get much better, and would reach mastery. the hackers never get to 10,000 hours of real practice. They MIGHT get to 10,000 hours of drinking beer and chatting about the snack cart girl. That’s not the same. You do subscribe to the theory, all you’ve done is explain why people don’t get there.

  5. Yes, practicing to enhance skills and talents is one of the exceptions in the quantity versus quality debate. But it is a matter of choosing something worthy, a passion, a necessary set of competencies, though I suppose that beer drinking or fly swatting or anything else is a competency to be mastered, with practice, if you wish.

    But I’ll take painting or music or writing over all that.

    Yes, talent + drive + hard work. QUANTITY, to enhance quality.

    Loved this post.
    BigLittleWolf´s last blog ..Kissing Booth Marketing My ComLuv Profile

  6. Hi Wolf, It does seem like some activities are a little more worth while than others, doesn’t it?

  7. Yes, I agree. Success really is “derived from hard work.” Much is to be said for setting goals and pursuing them with passion and dedication.
    Stephanie´s last blog ..FOR FAMILIES: Personalized Map from National Geographic My ComLuv Profile

Post a Comment


        CommentLuv Enabled
Keith Wilcox on Facebook